Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ronald Calzone v. Chris Koster, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3650
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ronald Calzone
Defendant - Appellee: Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, J. Bret Johnson, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol and Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Missouri
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant: Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee: Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant: Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3266
Plaintiff - Appellee: Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellant: Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant: Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3058
Plaintiff - Appellant: Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee: Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant: Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Edward Plastino, et al v. Chris Koster, et al
as 13-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. and Edward F. Plastino
Defendant / Appellee: Chris Koster, in his official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Missouri and Tom Neer, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of St. Charles County, Missouri
Edward Plastino, et al v. Chris Koster, et al
as 13-1974
Plaintiff - Appellant: Edward F. Plastino and Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Chris Koster, in his official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Missouri and Tom Neer, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of St. Charles County, Missouri
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant: Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant: Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant: Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and Tim Fitch, in his official capacity as Chief of the St. Louis County, Missouri, Police Department
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3076
Plaintiff - Appellee: Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellant: Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant: Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Raymond Blackburn, in his official capacity as Chief of the Lebanon Police Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?