Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Micah Matthews v. Chris Tripp
as 23-1877
Petitioner / Appellant:
Micah Sherif Matthews
Respondent / Appellee:
Chris Tripp
Craig Smith v. Chris Tripp
as 23-1680
Petitioner:
Craig Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Chris Tripp, Warden of the Iowa State Penitentiary
Eddie Hicks v. Chris Tripp
as 23-1441
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eddie Hicks
Respondent / Appellee:
Chris Tripp
Thompson v. Bowker, et al.
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Eric Mel Thompson
Defendant:
Rebecca Bowker, Kim Reynolds, Thomas Miller and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashburn v. Bowker et al
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ashburn
Defendant:
Rebecca Bowker, Kim Reynolds, Thomas Miller and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Bowker et al
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Bennett
Defendant:
Rebecca Bowker, Kim Reynolds, Thomas Miller and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Wilcox et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Wilcox and Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Eric Hall
Defendant:
Randy Gibbs, Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tripp
as 4:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Craig Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copenhaver v. Tripp
as 1:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Randy Mitchell Copenhaver
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
