Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ward Jackson v. Pioneer Bank, et al
as 26-2604
Plaintiff:
Ward E. Jackson
Defendant:
Pioneer Bank, David Krause, Lance Jeppson and others
Donald Sauve v. Kanabec County, et al
as 26-2408
Plaintiff:
Donald Gerard Sauve
Defendant:
Kanabec County, Christa Rutherford, Stoney L. Hiljus, Judge and others
Sauve v. Kanabec County et al
as 0:2026mc00050
Plaintiff:
Donald Gerard Sauve
Defendant:
Kanabec County, Christa Rutherford-Block, Stoney L. Hiljus and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jackson v. Pioneer Bank et al
as 0:2026cv02838
Defendant:
Bethany Perrizo, Pioneer Bank, David Krause and others
Plaintiff:
Ward E. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Pioneer Bank et al
as 0:2025cv04530
Defendant:
Pioneer Bank, David Krause, Lance Jepson and others
Plaintiff:
Ward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sibley v. Rutherford et al
as 0:2025cv04331
Plaintiff:
Moirsche Sibley
Defendant:
Christa Rutherford, Nick Grundhouser, John Doe Supervisors 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moirsche Sibley v. Christa Rutherford, et al
as 25-2988
Plaintiff:
Moirsche Terrell Sibley
Defendant:
Christa Rutherford, in her individual and official capacity, Nick Grundhouser, Badge #4615, in his individual and official capacity, Minnesota Court of Appeals and others
Sibley v. Rutherford et al
as 0:2025cv02716
Defendant:
Christa Rutherford, Nick Grundhouser, Minnesota Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Moirsche Terrell Sibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saye Gofan, Jr. v. Susan Miles, et al
as 25-1312
Plaintiff:
Saye Henry Gofan, Jr.
Defendant:
Susan Rester Miles, Judge, Samantha Corlew, City Attorney, Blair Buccicone, City Attorney and others
Gofan v. Miles et al
as 0:2025cv00328
Defendant:
Russell, Susan R. Miles, Samatha Corlew and others
Plaintiff:
Saye Henry Gofan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
