Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sedell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Christen L. Sedell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baker et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Kayla Baker, Christen Davis, Neely Jack and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heyward et al v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv02499
Defendant:
Ibrahim Abdulrahim Al-Hagg, Dr. B. Potts, K. Riehle and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Cooper, Mathew May, Mark White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Harris
as 4:2019cv00653
Petitioner:
Christen J. Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Filing error
as 3:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
Christen Raisor, Laurisa LaRose Mowery and Conrad Smith
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raisor et al v. Menard, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Christen Raisor , Laurisa LaRose Mowery and Conrad Smith
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
