Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARSHALL v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARCIA et al v. OWNEZ ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN E. CAZARES GARCIA and VERENIS ESPINO
Defendant:
OWNEZ ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, OWNEZ INC., EFRAIM ARGAMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
AKOUALA v. AMAZON et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN AKOUALA
Defendant:
AMAZON, FEDEX GROUND/ OFFICE and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wilder v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wilder
Defendant:
Christian K Mitchell, Sherri Lynn Kinzie, Danielle Nicole Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Jacob Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Bechtold
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pitre and Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Jacob Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. Whitley Superior Court
as 1:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pitre and Matthew Christian Pitre
Defendant:
Whitley Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
