Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Christianson et al v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Donald Christianson, Isabel Prado, Neil Moura and others
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc., CoxCom, LLC and Cox Communications California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kari Aanenson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05047
Plaintiff:
Lori Stolle, Kari Aanenson, Michael Abel and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harvey Alequin et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04963
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kranz-Mitchell, Harvey Alequin, Mark Allesandro and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aanenson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Lori Stolle, Kari Aanenson, Michael Abel and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Alequin et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Harvey Alequin, Mark Allesandro, Debbra Allington and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Trust Services LLC, LL Bradford and Company LLC, James Settlement Services, LLC and others
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01716
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Settlement Services, LLC, Conestoga International, LLC, Conestoga Trust Services, LLC and others
Christianson v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada et al
as 1:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
Judy Christianson
Defendant:
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and Todd Syprett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
