Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hernandez v. IDOC move coordinator et al
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
IDOC move coordinator, Jay Christianson, Tyrell Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Regis et al
as 1:2020cv00467
Respondent:
Governor Brad Little, Maric Bussacco, Director Josh Tewalt and others
Petitioner:
Bradley Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christianson et al v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00325
Plaintiff:
Wei S Christianson and Jon L Christianson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Demotte et al v. Christianson et al
as 1:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Unknown Corizon Medical Staff, Rona Siegert, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell A. Demotte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Christianson et al
as 1:2019cv00420
Defendant:
C/P McDonald, Dr. Berri, Warden Christianson and others
Plaintiff:
Alex David Tony Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christianson et al v. Tomich et al
as 1:2019cv00416
Defendant:
Sean Tomich, Idahome Realty Group, LLC and Tomich Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Idaho Home Realty LLC and Michael Christianson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Contreras v. Christianson
as 1:2019cv00098
Respondent:
Jay Christianson
Petitioner:
Jorge Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christianson et al v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00519
Plaintiff:
Jon L and Wei S Christianson, W Michael Humphreys, H Hook LLC and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Hawkins v. Idaho Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Idaho Board of Corrections, Keith Yordy, Christianson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rendon v. Yordy et al
as 1:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
Steven J Rendon
Defendant:
Keith Yordy, Randy Blades, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
