Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00943
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Grey v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02622
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Grey and Christopher J. Kitrin
Respondent:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARQUEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv04083
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA MARQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pursche v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Pursche
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Randy Lind, Mike Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lujan
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Randy Lind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Woodson et al
as 1:2017cv01904
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Stout
Defendant:
Leonard Woodson, Christina Marquez, Steven Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
