Cases 1 - 10 of 374
Paylor v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02198
Plaintiff:
Tyrec Rayshun Paylor
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Christopher Austin and Sgt. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christa Cook and Christopher Derick Montgomery
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hubbard
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostick v. Vantell
as 3:2023cv01352
Petitioner:
Christopher Bostick
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray Young
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Tommy Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockman v. Dickson County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Lockman
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryans v. USA
as 3:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Mark Christopher Ryans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01181
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Dickson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Christopher Patrick Holland
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Chase Andrew Christopher Smith
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. doing business as Trousdale Turner Correctional Facility and Sgt. Cortney Q. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
