Cases 11 - 20 of 435
Ted Stone v. Christopher Epp
as 17-60483
Petitioner - Appellant:
TED STONE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS
Zachary Johnson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 17-60447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, JOHNNIE DENMARK, MARY DIXON and others
Jack Wilson v. Wexford Health Sources, et al
as 17-60181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK B. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, CEO and President, CENTURION OF MISSISSIPPI, Willie Knight, Site Manager, MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Soloman Kennedy v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 16-60593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, JUAN SANTOS, DOCTOR UNKNOWN BURKE and others
William Gaskin v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 16-60182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS GASKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOCTOR RON WOODALL and DOCTOR GWEN WOODLAND
Shawn States v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 16-60084
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN M. STATES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Thomas Ellis v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, PHIL BRYANT, SERGEANT BARTEE and others
Ferlando Esco v. Christopher Epp
as 15-60708
Petitioner - Appellant:
FERLANDO ESCO
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lafayette v. Epps et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lafayette
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, David Petrie, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
