Cases 41 - 50 of 435
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Shetica Lockhart, Brenda Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00087
Petitioner:
John A. Ross, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Epps et al
as 3:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Glen Brown
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Michael White, Q. Abangan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayers v. Epps
as 3:2014cv00372
Petitioner:
Kirk Vincent Mayers
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Detrick Harris v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 14-60277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETRICK DEWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HINDS COUNTY, LAUDERDALE COUNTY, SERGEANT RUFFIN and others
Green v. Banks et al
as 3:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Derron Green
Defendant:
Unknown Banks, Eydie Winkel, Michael White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melissa Webster v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 14-60202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA ELAINE WEBSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, JAMES HOLMAN, Superintendent and others
Clark v. McLaurin et al
as 3:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Clark
Defendant:
Lyllisia McLaurin, Tirah Wesley, Unknown Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Epps et al
as 5:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Billy Gene Keyes
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, D. Petrie, Unknown Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Craig Alexander , Robert Anderson , Orves Baker and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections , Christopher B. Epps , Mississippi Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
