Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. Cole
as 18-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ShaVelle Lamarr Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Lieutenant Amy Bouck, Steuben County Jail, Keith Kastner-Smith and Lorrie Gardner
Defendant:
Sheriff David V. Cole, Steuben County Jail, UnderSheriff James L. Allard, Steuben County Jail, Major Matthew P. Whitmore, Steuben County Jail and others
Christopher Handy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20794
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HANDY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-20786
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Handy v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2017cv03650
Plaintiff:
Christopher Handy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, TDCJ Board of Directors and Executive Directors, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03213
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Christopher Handy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20540
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HANDY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Christopher Handy, Sr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20432
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HANDY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Christopher Handy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20417
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HANDY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Handy v. Davis
as 4:2017cv01712
Petitioner:
Christopher Handy
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Handy v. Davis
as 4:2017cv01115
Petitioner:
Christopher Handy
Respondent:
LORIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
