Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Driscoll v. Hamula et al
as 6:2018cv06121
Plaintiff: Daron Erle Driscoll, Jr.
Defendant: John Hamula, Vittucci, Hughey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. Moss et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv06839
Plaintiff: Daron Erle Driscoll
Defendant: Christopher Moss, Washburn, Weeden A. Wetmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. Chemung County et al
as 6:2017cv06752
Plaintiff: Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant: Chemung County, Ryan Card, Christopher Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSS v. PAV'R CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv00408
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MOSS
Defendant: PAV'R CONSTRUCTION INC, PAV'R CONSTRUCTION OF PENSACOLA INC and MICHEL J BRETON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Moss v. Waffle House Inc
as 9:2014cv03991
Plaintiff: Christopher Moss
Defendant: Waffle House Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tebo v. Moss et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv06503
Plaintiff: Nancy Anne Tebo
Defendant: Christopher Moss, Daniel Mandell and Charles Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2431
Debtor - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Muniz v. Moss et al
as 1:2011cv00419
Plaintiff: Albiso C. Muniz
Defendant: Christopher Moss, Charles Wilson, Lois Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Moss et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv06015
Plaintiff: James R. Ryan
Defendant: Christopher Moss , Scott Wheeler and Richard L. Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv06628
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?