Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Stine v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00751
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Blake Davis, Christopher Synsvoll, Mark Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Akers v. Daniel, et al
as 09-1552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILEY Y. DANIEL, LEWIS T. BABCOCK, ZITA L WEINSHIENK and others
Akers v. Daniel et al
as 1:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Wiley Y. Daniel, Lewis T. Babcock, Zita L. Weinshienk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 09-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee:
Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 08-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2008cv02572
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Boyd N. Boland, Robert M. Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Akers v. Vratil et al
as 5:2008cv03271
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Kathryn H Vratil, Kim I Martin, Michael Shute and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Akers v. Wiley, et al
as 08-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILEY, G. B. CHURCH, WENDY HEIM and others
Akers v. Wiley et al
as 1:2008cv00723
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
R. Wiley, G. B. Church, Wendy Heim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
