Cases 1 - 10 of 35
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21093
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24049
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19057
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv01515
Petitioner:
Tyrone Christopher Thompson
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNDERWOOD v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KEITH UNDERWOOD and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
PAUL THOMAS, Steven Walker and CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Merchandising Solutions Group, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05313
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson and Lauren Thompson
Defendant:
Merchandising Solutions Group, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67723
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hewitt v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01918
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hewitt
Defendant:
Roger Garrison, CPL. Thompson, CPL. Christopher Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
