Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 104
City of Jefferson, Missouri v. AT&T Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00313
Plaintiff: City of Jefferson, Missouri
Defendant: AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, f/k/a Cingular Wireless, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Daniel Rodriguez v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-11438
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
: AT&T and CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC
Nathan Riensche v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, et al
as 14-35375
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHAN RIENSCHE, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES PURCHASING COMPANY LP, a Delaware corporation doing business as Cingular Wireless and others
Jonathan Kaltwasser v. USDC-CASF
as 11-73752
: In re: JONATHAN C KALTWASSER
Petitioner: JONATHAN C KALTWASSER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless, LLC
Jonathan Kaltwasser v. USDC-CASF
as 11-73752
Not Classified By Court: In re: JONATHAN C KALTWASSER and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless, LLC
Petitioner: JONATHAN C KALTWASSER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Martha Self v. BellSouth Mobility, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-13998
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTHA SELF, an Individual
Defendant - Appellee: BELLSOUTH MOBILITY, INC., a Corporation, AT & T MOBILITY, LLC, AMERICAN CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION and others
: SERVICE
Heather Stern, et al v. Karin Lynch
as 10-57062
Plaintiff - Appellee: HEATHER STERN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: KARIN LYNCH
Objector: MARC GAMBELLO and GENE HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless Corporation and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Cingular Wireless LLC
Judy Larson, et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 10-4755
Plaintiff - Appellee: JUDY LARSON, WILLIE DAVIS, JOE MILLIRON and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T MOBILITY LLC, formerly known as CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC, SPRINT NEXTEL CORP, SPRINT SPECTRUM and others
Not Party - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER V. LANGONE
Heather Stern, et al v. Marc Gambello, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-56929
Plaintiff - Appellee: HEATHER STERN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, BROOKE RANDOLPH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JOHN GIRARD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: MARC GAMBELLO and GENE HOPKINS
Defendant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless Corporation and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Cingular Wireless LLC
Judy Larson, et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 10-4352
Plaintiff - Appellee: JUDY LARSON, WILLIE DAVIS, JOE MILLIRON and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T MOBILITY LLC, formerly known as CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC, SPRINT NEXTEL CORP, SPRINT SPECTRUM and others
Amicus - Appellant: BRANDON WILKINSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?