Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Langworthy v. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
as 4:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kamath v. Alsup et al
as 5:2023cv06494
Plaintiff:
Reshma Kamath
Defendant:
William Haskell Alsup, Thomas Hixson, Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grigg v. U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
as 3:2023cv02638
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. Siam Lim et al
as 3:2022cv04605
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Allison Meow Siam Lim, Chong Kwan Tan, Goh Chok Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Diane Davis et al
as 2:2021cv06340
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Dianne Davis, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Georgia State Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andre Nesbit v. Cook County et al
as 2:2021cv05320
Defendant:
Gray Law, Cook County, Nya Prude and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Nesbit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derek Tam Sing v. Department of Justice (DOJ) et al
as 2:2021cv02738
Defendant:
Andre Birotte, Stephanie Yonakura, John Palmieri and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Tam Sing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Strange v. US Army et al
as 2:2020cv02408
Defendant:
US Army and 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Plaintiff:
Levi Garcia Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eduardo Jacobs v. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
as 2:2020cv10411
Defendant:
6th Circuit Court of Appeals
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
