Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Antron Cannon v. Walker Filip, et al
as 24-3113
Plaintiff:
ANTRON CANNON
Defendant:
NATHALIA PINEDA, JOSEPH E. HOWE, CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS and others
Reta v. Harroun et al
as 1:2024cv03212
Defendant:
Daniel Aguirre, Douglas Harroun and City of Aurora, Colorado
Plaintiff:
Juan Ruiz Reta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef - Fed. Question - Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Handy (PS) v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv03082
Defendant:
City of Aurora and Kevin Barnes
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams (PS) v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv02948
Defendant:
Jessica Yates and City of Aurora
Plaintiff:
Ahmuan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Ash v. City of Aurora, et al
as 24-2774
Defendant:
SAL CONTRERAS, Officer, JEFF SHERWOOD, Officer, JASON RUSSELL, Officer and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. ASH
Murphy v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv02726
Defendant:
Garrett Strode, Eric Dunston, City of Aurora Police Department, The and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chapman v. City of Aurora, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHAPMAN
Defendant:
TONY HANNAH, Officer, OFFICER PARTICIPANT DAVID GALLEGOS, OFFICER JAMES DECLAIRE and others
Antron Cannon v. Walker Filip, et al
as 24-2655
Defendant:
WALKER FILIP, P.O., #393, NATHALIA PINEDA, CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTRON CANNON
Packard, et al v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BLASINGAME, HOLLIS LYMAN, JACQUELYN PARKINS and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, KEITH VALENTINE, CORY BUDAJ and others
Torres-Encinas v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
Alessandro Torres-Encinas
Defendant:
William Oxford, III and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
