Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Smith v. Novoa et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Dannette Novoa, Triple A Insurance, City of Clovis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. Novoa et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Dannette Novoa, Triple A Insurance and The City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hannah v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2024at00134
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hannah
Defendant:
City of Clovis, P. Garcia, S O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hannah v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hannah
Defendant:
City of Clovis, P. Garcia and S O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Keohavang v. City of Clovis
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Leuthvilay Keohavang
Defendant:
City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De la Torre et al v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2022at00449
Plaintiff:
Juan De la Torre and Estate of Isabel De La Torre
Defendant:
City of Clovis and Unknown Law Enforcement Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De la Torre et al v. City of Clovis
as 1:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Juan De la Torre and Estate of Isabel De La Torre
Defendant:
City of Clovis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jones
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Officer Pluss #5823, Officer Markarian #5808 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoeckel v. Clovis et al
as 1:2022at00027
Plaintiff:
Dallas Stoeckel
Defendant:
City Of Clovis, Timothy Dronek, Meredith Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoeckel v. Clovis et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dallas Stoeckel
Defendant:
City Of Clovis, Timothy Dronek, Meredith Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
