Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Garcia v. City of McAllen et al
as 7:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Garcia
Defendant:
City of McAllen and McAllen Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Barrera v. City of McAllen, Texas
as 7:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe R. Barrera
Defendant:
City of McAllen, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Castillo v. City of McAllen, Texas et al
as 7:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Santiago Castillo
Defendant:
City of McAllen, Texas , R. Ramirez and Hector Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. City of McAllen Texas
as 7:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jose F Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of McAllen Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Idelma Saenz, et al v. City of McAllen, et al
as 09-41072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IDELMA ANA SAENZ, YOLANDA RAMIREZ, GLORIA SAENZ, Individually and as Next Friend of Diana Figueroa and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MCALLEN, ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, HUMBERTO RESENDEZ and others
Whitney et al v. City of McAllen
as 7:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Whitney and Joy Whitney
Defendant:
City of McAllen and City of McAllen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jaramillo v. City of McAllen, et al
as 08-40308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMELIA JARAMILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MCALLEN, HERMELINDA SMITH, EDUARDO SMITH and others
Zarzar et al v. Flores et al
as 7:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zarzar and Pilar Zarzar
Defendant:
Alberto Flores, Carlos Morales and City of McAllen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jaramillo v. City of McAllen Texas et al
as 7:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
Amelia Jaramillo
Defendant:
City of McAllen Texas, Hermelinda Smith, Eduardo Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
