Cases 31 - 40 of 142
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. City of Mobile et al
as 1:2020cv00514
Defendant:
City Of Mobile and Ladd Peebles Stadium
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bayside Property Consultants LLC et al v. City Of Mobile et al
as 1:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Joe Reagan, Exit Realty, Mobile City Council and others
Plaintiff:
Bayside Property Consultants LLC and Steve Mears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. City of Mobile, AL
as 1:2019cv00919
Defendant:
City of Mobile, AL
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. City of Mobile, AL
as 1:2019cv00917
Defendant:
City of Mobile, AL
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thai Meditation Association, et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama
as 19-12418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIVAPORN NIMITYONGSKUL, VARIN NIMITYONGSKUL, THAI MEDITATION ASSOCIATION OF ALABAMA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA
Keith Cruitt v. David Reyes, et al
as 19-12387
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE BATTISTE, Chief of Police for City of Mobile, Alabama, DAVID C. REYES, OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH BRIAN CRUITT
Jerone Young v. City of Mobile, et al
as 19-11139
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDY STIMPSON, CITY OF MOBILE, JAMES H. BARBER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERONE YOUNG
WM Mobile Bay Environmental v. The City Of Mobile Solid
as 19-10239
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITY OF MOBILE SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY
Other:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WM MOBILE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER, INC.
Craig et al v. The City of Mobile et al
as 1:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
Karen Lucky and Selena Craig
Defendant:
Willie Baker, The City of Mobile and Ivan Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
