Cases 101 - 110 of 159
Dalessandro v City of Akron, et al
as 5:2012cv02361
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Dalessandro
Defendant:
City of Akron , Officer M Dietrick , Officer M Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Louis Dana Gradisher v City of Akron, et al
as 5:2012cv02362
Plaintiff:
Louis Dana Gradisher
Defendant:
City of Akron , Matthew Hackathorn , Jeffrey P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Copeland
Defendant:
City of Akron and Judge R R Clunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarah Watkins v. City of Akron
as 11-4179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AKRON
Robinson et al v. Deep Dark Order of Seducees et al
as 5:2011cv02307
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Robinson, Jr., Thomas P. Creisa, Evelyn Price and others
Defendant:
Deep Dark Order of Seducees, Worldwide Order, Satanic Order and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savick v. City of Akron, Ohio et al
as 5:2011cv02061
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Savick
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio and Akron Civil Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Akron v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2011cv01231
Plaintiff:
City of Akron
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
USA v. City of Akron, et al
as 11-3556
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
CITY OF AKRON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO
George et al v. Anspach et al
as 5:2011cv00979
Plaintiff:
Anita L. George and Winona C. Bush
Defendant:
Mark A. Anspach , Summit County Sheriff , Summit County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
