Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
County of Summit, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv00170
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Valley Fire District, The City of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, Village of Boston Heights, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 5:2017cv01582
Defendant:
City of Akron and Terry Pasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salem, et al v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2017cv01583
Plaintiff:
Joseph Salem and Spot for Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
City of Akron , Terry Pasco and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbetzor v. Beverlin et al
as 5:2016cv03058
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Colbetzor
Defendant:
John Beverlin , Akron Board of Education , Thomas Kekela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddings-Beard v. Edsall, et al
as 5:2016cv02802
Plaintiff:
Jaelen D. Biddings-Beard
Defendant:
City of Akron , Jeffrey Edsall , Daniel W. Engelhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2016cv02587
Plaintiff:
Lonnie M. Jones
Defendant:
City of Akron , Dan Horrigan , Duane Groeger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemmon v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2016cv02356
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, James Nice and Brian Armstead
Plaintiff:
William T. Lemmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Robinson et al
as 5:2016cv02179
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Robinson, T. Stump, J. Berdysz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dekany v. City of Akron, Ohio et al
as 5:2016cv01829
Plaintiff:
Alexis Dekany
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio , City of Stow, Ohio , Akron Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
