Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Proctor v. City of Akron Police Department, et al
as 5:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Proctor
Defendant:
City of Akron Police Department, Madison Hooper, Ashley Radak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Filing Error
as 5:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Proctor
Defendant:
City of Akron Police Department, Madison Hooper and Ashley Radak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce v. City of Akron, Ohio
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bruce
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles Hicks and Charles Hicks
Defendant:
City of Akron, Acting Chief Michael Caprez, Officer John Turnure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hilton et al v. Akron et al
as 5:2022cv02013
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Hilton and Desire Littlejohn
Defendant:
Akron Police Department and City of Akron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Summit County et al
as 5:2022cv01649
Plaintiff:
Curtis Williams, II
Defendant:
Summit County, City of Akron, Elinore Marsh Stormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinson v. Barberton Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00738
Defendant:
Anthony Geno Martinson, Barberton Police Department, Baberton Police Department Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
