Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CITY OF ALMATY, KAZAKHSTAN et al v. UDOVENKO
as 1:2019mc00171
Respondent:
ALEKSANDR UDOVENKO
Petitioner:
CITY OF ALMATY, KAZAKHSTAN and BTA BANK JSC
City of Almaty, Kazakhstan v. Sater
as 1:2019cv02647
Petitioner:
Alexsandr Udovenko
Defendant:
Felix Sater
Plaintiff:
City of Almaty, Kazakhstan
City of Almaty, Kazakhstan et al v. Sater et al
as 1:2019cv02645
Defendant:
RRMI-DR LLC, Daniel Ridloff, Ferrari Holdings LLC (NJ) and others
Plaintiff:
BTA Bank JSC and City of Almaty, Kazakhstan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
City of Almaty et al v. Gennady Petelin
as 1:2018mc00227
Movant:
City of Almaty , Kazakhstan and BTA Bank JSC
Respondent:
Gennady Petelin
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
City of Almaty et al v. Gennady Petelin
as 2:2018mc00049
Movant:
BTA Bank JSC, City of Almaty and Kazakhstan
Respondent:
Gennady Petelin
Application of City of Almaty for Order to Take Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 1:2016mc00623
In Re:
Application of City of Almaty for Order to Take Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Respondent:
RPM USA, LLC and RPM-Maro LLC
City of Almaty, Kazahkstan, et al. v. Mukhtar Ablyazov, et al.
as 1:2015cv05345
Interested Party:
Frank Monstrey
Counter Defendant:
BTA Bank JSC, Viktor Khrapunov, Mukhtar Ablyazov and others
Plaintiff:
CF 135 West Members LLC, Chetrit Group LLC and CF 135 Flat LLC
Defendant:
Triadou SPV S.A. and City of Almaty
Petitioner:
Elena Petelin, Svetlana Chepurnaya, Gennady Petelin and others
Not Yet Classified:
Hon. Herman Cahn
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Meyer
Cross Defendant:
FBME Bank Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
City of Almaty v. Viktor Khrapunov et al
as 2:2015cv02628
Defendant:
Madina Ablyazova, Iliyas Khrapunov, Leila Khrapunov and others
Plaintiff:
City of Almaty
City of Almaty v. Viktor Khrapunov et al
as 2:2014cv03650
Defendant:
628 Holdings LLC, Madina Ablyazova, Candian International Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
City of Almaty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
