Cases 41 - 50 of 429
Gibson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Andre Gibson
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Atlanta Police Department and others
Rolfe v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02339
Plaintiff:
Garrett Rolfe
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brosnan v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02337
Plaintiff:
Devin Brosnan
Defendant:
Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Donald Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dixon
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Police Chief Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Horne et al
as 1:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Sean George
Defendant:
Officer J. Horne, Officer FNU Deegan, Officer FNU Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Shorter v. The Fulton County Medical Examiner Center et al
as 1:2022cv01757
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Shorter
Defendant:
The Fulton County Medical Examiner Center, Bertram Ennett, Unknown Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Spencer Thomas
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Erika Shields, Rodney Bryant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
