Cases 41 - 50 of 582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
1020 Bolton Holdings, LLC v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
1020 Bolton Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Fulton County/City of Atlanta Land Bank Authority, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DENSON v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
WYDERICAS TEREZ DENSON
Defendant:
Correction Officer Thomas, City of Atlanta and Andre Dickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight et al v. City of Atlanta
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Marie Knight, Katrina Knight, Dynasti Mykell Haynie-Knight and others
Defendant:
City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Graham-Kilby v. J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv01221
Defendant:
Assurant, J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A., McCalla Raymer Leibert and Pierce LLC and others
Plaintiff:
J. Graham-Kilby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
DENSON v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
WYDERICAS TEREZ DENSON
Defendant:
OFFICER THOMAS, CITY OF ATLANTA and Mayor ANDRE DICKENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Thomas v. Hines et al
as 1:2022cv04417
Plaintiff:
Maggie Thomas
Defendant:
James Hines and City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
