Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lootens v. City Of Batavia et al
as 1:2024cv03204
Plaintiff:
Hope E. Lootens
Defendant:
City Of Batavia, Scott Buening, DREW RACKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
E. Hope Lootens
Defendant:
City of Batavia, The, Scott Buening, DREW RACKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Martrell Webb v. City of Batavia, et al
as 23-3184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTRELL JOHNSON WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATAVIA, MATTHEW MILLER, Officer and GREG SULAVER, Officer
Jinmei Zhang v. Shawn Mazza, et al
as 22-1440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JINMEI ZHANG
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN MAZZA, Sergeant, KEVIN BRETZ, Officer, CITY OF BATAVIA and others
Webb v. The City of Batavia et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Martrell Johnson Webb
Defendant:
The City of Batavia, Officer Miller, Officer Sulaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rech v. The City of Batavia
as 20-794
Defendant / Appellee:
Detective Kevin Czora, Sgt. Thad Mart, The City of Batavia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Rech
Rech v. The City of Batavia et al
as 6:2015cv06732
Plaintiff:
Michael Rech
Defendant:
The City of Batavia , The City of Batavia Police Department , Thad Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. City of Batavia et al
as 1:2013cv01857
Plaintiff:
Antwone Hooks
Defendant:
City of Batavia, Thomas Doggett and George A. Gramme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Yaeger
as 10-5216
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert J. Yaeger, Sergeant, Michael A. Kibler, Officer and City of Batavia
Defendant - Appellant:
Earl Benson
Butler et al v. City of Batavia et al
as 1:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
Stacy Butler and Carol Sojda
Defendant:
City of Batavia, Chief of Police Sehms, Officer Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
