Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coke v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Markus Coke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham Police Department and Zydeco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hendrix v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2018cv00586
Plaintiff:
Craig Hendrix
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, A C Roper and Becky White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martin v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00355
Plaintiff:
Mario Martin
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham Police Department, Dewayne Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Elbow River Marketing Limited Partnership v. Barnett et al
as 2:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Elbow River Marketing Limited Partnership
Defendant:
J Thomas Barnett and City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Minnifield v. The City of Birmingham Alabama
as 2:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
Montague Minnifield
Defendant:
The City of Birmingham Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
