Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wright et al v. City of Bloomfield Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
HJay Wright and Edythe Garbarini
Defendant:
City Of Bloomfield, Garrett Jackson, David Karst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Integrated Water Services, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Integrated Water Services, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Bloomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Padilla v. City of Bloomfield Hills et al
as 2:2021cv11304
Defendant:
Fred Bismack, Christopher Furlong, City of Bloomfield Hills and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Bloomfield Hills, MI, et al v. Joseph Ziegler
as 16-2482
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI and JULIE A. NELSON-KLEIN
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH RAYMOND ZIEGLER
City of Bloomfield Hills v. Ziegler
as 4:2016cv13383
Plaintiff:
City of Bloomfield Hills and Julie A. Nelson-Klein
Defendant:
Joseph Raymond Ziegler
Grano v. City of Bloomfield, et al.
as 1:2016cv00937
Plaintiff:
Mark Grano , Billie Rogers , John Rogers, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Bloomfield, Andrew Darby and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William P. Froling
as 15-2578
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM P. FROLING
Respondent:
CITY OF BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
William Froling, et al v. City of Bloomfield Hill
as 15-2169
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. FROLING and MARILYN FROLING
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
Steigelman v. McDaniel, et al
as 15-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND STEIGELMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEVI MCDANIEL and J. DARBY, individually and in their offical capacities as Police Officers for the City of Bloomfield
William Froling, et al v. City of Bloomfield Hill
as 15-1577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM P. FROLING and MARILYN FROLING
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BLOOMFIELD HILLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
