Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner: CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1301
Petitioner: City of Piedmont, California, Howard County, Maryland, City of Gaithersburg, Maryland and others
Respondent: United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner: LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv12170
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cellco Partnership v. City of Boston, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv11936
Defendant: Paul J. Donnelly, Danielle Santos, Beacon Hill Architectural Commission and others
Plaintiff: Cellco Partnership
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor: CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner: CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner: COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor: CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant: 6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv12925
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?