Cases 1 - 10 of 12
City of Bowie, Maryland v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07524
Plaintiff:
City of Bowie, Maryland
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Bowie, Maryland v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02773
Plaintiff:
City of Bowie, Maryland
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Bowie, Maryland v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02773
Plaintiff:
City of Bowie, Maryland
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alliance for Communications, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72736
Petitioner:
CITY OF PALO ALTO, ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA, ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNICATIONS DEMOCRACY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
The Alliance for Communication, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1221
Petitioner:
The City of Portland, Maine, Alliance for Community Media, City of Palo Alto, California and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
City of Eugene, Oregon, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70344
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA, CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON and CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Harford County, Maryland et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45853
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harford County, Maryland, City of Frederick, Maryland, City of Bowie, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Harford County, Maryland et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as MD/1:18-cv-01913
Plaintiff:
Harford County, Maryland , Caroline County, Maryland , Garrett County, Maryland and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Cephalon, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
