Cases 1 - 10 of 195
ROCKEMORE v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ROCKEMORE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROMAN v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv05940
Plaintiff:
JOSE C. ROMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv05939
Plaintiff:
TROY A. BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2022cv05664
Plaintiff:
ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant:
GOV. PHILIP D. MURPHY and CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARMICHAEL v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv05019
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRICKLAND v. STATE OF N.J. et al
as 1:2022cv04266
Plaintiff:
SABRINA STRICKLAND
Defendant:
STATE OF N.J. and CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
Taron Hill
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, CAMDEN COUNTY, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROCKEMORE v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2022cv01942
Plaintiff:
TYRONE P. ROCKEMORE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MCMILLON v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2021cv20237
Plaintiff:
LARRY MCMILLON and LARRY MCMILLAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and URI HALLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
