Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Jeffery Henson v. City of Danville, et al
as 23-3349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY T. HENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DANVILLE, PHILLIP M. WILSON, RALPH DUNHAM and others
Rodgers v. Orcutt et al
as 2:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Mary Rodgers
Defendant:
Kathleen Orcutt, Vermilion County and City of Danville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henson v. City of Danville Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Henson
Defendant:
City of Danville Police Department, City of Indianapolis Police Department, P Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Offutt et al v. City of Danville et al
as 2:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Paul Offutt, Offutt Development Inc and Security Ventures Inc
Defendant:
City of Danville, Jr Rickey Williams, Sam Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. City of Danville et al
as 2:2021cv02194
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wilson
Defendant:
City of Danville, Clifford Hegg, T.J. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Phillips v. Leigh et al
as 2:2020cv02231
Defendant:
Bricie Leigh, City of Danville, Jacqueline Lacy and others
Plaintiff:
Myron E Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Wasson et al
as 2:2020cv02144
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lymon
Defendant:
City of Danville, Seth Talbott, Vermilion County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. City of Danville et al
as 2:2020cv02046
Defendant:
City of Danville, David Schnelle, Scott Eisenhauer and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Troglia et al
as 2:2020cv02015
Defendant:
J Troglia, Crawley, Ablinger and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
