Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Duluth, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45304
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Duluth, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Duluth, Minnesota v. Reichl et al
as 2:2016cv00834
Defendant:
FRANK A REICHL, GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Duluth, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Duluth, Minnesota v. Reichl et al
as MN/0:15-cv-04435
Defendant:
Frank A. Reichl , General Chemical Corporation , General Chemical Performance Products, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Duluth, Minnesota , CITY OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA and CITY OF NEWARK
City of Duluth v. Natl. Indian Gaming Commission, et al
as 15-5162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
National Indian Gaming Commission and Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, in his official capacity as chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission
Brian Potocnik v. Anoka County, et al
as 14-1974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian Potocnik
Defendant - Appellee:
Anoka County, Dakota County, Hennepin County and others
CITY OF DULUTH v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
CITY OF DULUTH
Defendant:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION and TRACIE STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CITY OF DULUTH v. KENNETH LEE SALAZAR
as 1:2012cv01116
Plaintiff:
CITY OF DULUTH
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
United States of America et al v. City of Duluth, The et al
as 0:2009cv01590
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and Minnesota, The State of
Defendant:
City of Duluth, The and Western Lake Superior Sanitary District
Cause Of Action: Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
