Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Godfrey v. City of Eunice
as 24-30711
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr.
Defendant:
Parish of Evangeline, Parish of St. Landry, City of Eunice and others
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court
as 24-30707
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Biz Stone, Ville Platte City Court and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr.
Godfrey v. Eunice et al
as 6:2024cv01351
Defendant:
Parish of St Landry, City of Eunice, Parish of Evangeline and others
Plaintiff:
**SANCTIONED/BARRED* Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court
as 24-30518
Defendant:
Noah Glass, Biz Stone, City of Eunice and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr.
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court et al
as 6:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant:
Eunice City Court, Ville Platte City Court, City of Ville Platte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Godfrey v. Eunice City Court et al
as 2:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant:
Eunice City Court, Ville Platte City Court, City of Ville Platte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Godfrey v. First Student et al
as 2:2023cv07377
Plaintiff:
Johnny Godfrey, Jr
Defendant:
First Student, Art Catering, Crosby Energy Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Noble v. City of Eunice, et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Durwood Owen Noble
Defendant:
City of Eunice and Carlton Glen Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LeBlanc v. Eunice et al
as 6:2022cv00552
Not Classified By Court:
CITY OF EUNICE and UNKNOWN OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
David LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Fontenot et al
as 6:2021cv01535
Defendant:
John Doe, Randy Fontenot, City of Eunice and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
