Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Nowlin v. Shannon et al
as 4:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
Olin Ray Nowlin
Respondent:
Joe Shannon, Jr. and State of Texas, City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowlin v. Shannon et al
as 1:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Olin Ray Nowlin
Defendant:
Joe Shannon, Jr and State of Texas, City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Morgan v. City of Fort Worth, et al
as 14-10032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FORT WORTH, JUDGE MIKE SINHA, JUDGE CYNTHIA MENDOZA and others
Riley v. Texas Dept.of Crim. Justice et al
as 4:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Riley, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Dept.of Crim. Justice, City of Fort Worth Texas and Sheriff Department of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Larry Morgan
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Mike Sinha, Cynthia Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morgan v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry Morgan
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Mike Sinha, Cynthia Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talkington v. City of Fort Worth Police Chief et al
as 4:2012cv00585
Plaintiff:
Randall E Talkington
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth Police Chief and Officer Abrams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2010cv00989
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Alexander
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth and Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Jackson v. T. Bunton, et al
as 10-11289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLINTON JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T BUNTON, OFFICER and CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
Paul Jackson v. T. Bunton, et al
as 10-11288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLINTON JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
T BUNTON, OFFICER and CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
