Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jobs for Downriver et al v. Michigan, State of - Governor et al
as 2:2020cv12114
Defendant:
Laura Pierce Auburn Hills City Clerk, City of Flat Rock, Jonathan Brater Michigan Bureau of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
Jobs for Downriver, Progress for Saline, Jobs for Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jobs for Downriver et al v. Michigan, State of - Governor et al
as 2:2020cv12115
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson Michigan Secretary of State, City of Flat Rock, City of Plymouth and others
Plaintiff:
Jobs for Downriver, Progress for Saline, Jobs for Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Candice Cheolas, et al v. City of Harper Woods, et al
as 09-2588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CANDICE ROSSI CHEOLAS and STEVE N. CHEOLAS
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS
Defendant:
LAWRENCE VANOVERBEKE
Candice Cheolas, et al v. City of Harper Woods, et al
as 09-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CANDICE ROSSI CHEOLAS and STEVE N. CHEOLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS and LAWRENCE VANOVERBEKE
City of Harper Woods Employees v. Richard (Dick) Olver, et al
as 08-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Harper Woods Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of BAE Systems, PLC.
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard (Dick) L. Olver, Michael J. Turner, Walter P. Havenstein and others
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. OLVER et al
as 1:2007cv01646
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
RICHARD (DICK) L. OLVER, MICHAEL J. TURNER, WALTER P. HAVENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
