Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dahl v. CIty of Houston Fire Department EMS et al
as 4:2022cv01857
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dahl
Defendant:
CIty of Houston Fire Department EMS and Houston Professional Fire Fighters Association, Local 341
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sportsplex of Houston, Inc. v. The City Of Houston et al
as 4:2020cv01596
Plaintiff:
Sportsplex of Houston, Inc.
Defendant:
The City Of Houston Fire Department, The City Of Houston and The City Of Houston Police Department
Petitioner:
Kathryn Kase
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of Houston Fire Department
as 4:2010mc00324
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
City of Houston Fire Department
Ivis Johnson v. City of Houston Fire Dept.
as 10-20300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVIS JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
Kathy Matthews v. City of Houston Fire Dept, et al
as 10-20219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, JACK WILLIAMS, Chief and DAVID SWAN
Kathy Matthews v. City of Houston Fire Dept., et al
as 09-20404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, DAVID SWAN and JACK WILLIAMS, Chief
Johnson v. City of Houston - Fire Department
as 4:2007cv04516
Plaintiff:
Ivis W. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Houston - Fire Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Matthews v. City of Houston Fire Department et al
as 4:2007cv01783
Plaintiff:
Kathy Matthews
Defendant:
City of Houston Fire Department, David Swan and Jack Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Matthews vs City of Houston Fire Department. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 07-320. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2007mc00320
Plaintiff:
Kathy Matthews
Defendant:
City of Houston Fire Department, David Swan and Jack Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
