Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Summit Locations, LLC et al v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Summit Locations, LLC and Huntington Outdoor, LLC
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky and Tyler Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lamont Fitch v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, et al
as 11-5620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT C. FITCH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LEITCHFIELD, KENTUCKY, GRAYSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, DARWIN DENNISON, Jailer, Individually and others
Logsdon v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Sherry Logsdon
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, Bart Glenn, Brandon Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont Fitch v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, et al
as 09-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT C. FITCH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LEITCHFIELD, KENTUCKY, GRAYSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, DARWIN DENNISON, Jailer, Individually and others
Lamont Fitch v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, et al
as 09-5697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT C. FITCH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LEITCHFIELD, KENTUCKY, GRAYSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, DARWIN DENNISON, Jailer, Individually and others
Boger v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mark Boger
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, Grayson County Detention Center, Juanita Decker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fitch v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lamont C. Fitch
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, Grayson County Detention Center, Darwin Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fitch v. City of Leitchfield, Kentucky et al
as 7:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
Lamont C. Fitch
Defendant:
City of Leitchfield, Kentucky, Grayson County Detention Center, Darwin Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
