Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Calhoun County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Calhoun County, Alabama, Clay County, Alabama, Talladega County, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Danneker v. City of Lincoln City et al
as 2:2022ms00059
Plaintiff:
Summer Danneker
Defendant:
City of Lincoln City, David Broderick, Robert Bomar and others
Danneker v. City of Lincoln City et al
as 2:2022ms00058
Plaintiff:
Summer Danneker
Defendant:
City of Lincoln City, David Broderick, Robert Bomar and others
Successor-in-Interest to Decedent David James Mandeville, Sr. et al v. City of Lincoln et al
as 2:2022at00683
Plaintiff:
DJMJ Successor-in-Interest to Decedent David James Mandeville, Sr., D.A.M. Successor-in-Interest to Decedent David James Mandeville, Sr. by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Angela Mandeville, D.J.M. Successor-in-Interest to Decedent David James Mandeville, Sr. by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Clairessa Frazier and others
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, City of Rocklin, DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
D.J.M.J. et al v. City of Lincoln et al
as 2:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
D.J.M.J., D.A.M., D.J.M. and others
Defendant:
City of Lincoln and City of Rocklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner:
LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
