Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10290
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11968
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10027
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Lowell, Massachusetts v. EPA
as 16-1361
Petitioner:
City of Lowell, Massachusetts
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Conservation Law Foundation
Lopez, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 08-8045
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ABEL CANO, Individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated, KEVIN SLEDGE, Individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated, CHARLES DEJESUS, Individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent:
LAWRENCE, MA, PAUL DIETL, In his capacity as Personnel Administrator for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, JOHN MICHAEL SULLIVAN, In his capacity as Mayor of the City of Lawrence, Massachusetts and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
