Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11968
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Agawam, Massachusetts et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10027
Plaintiff:
City of Agawam, Massachusetts, City of Amesbury, Massachusetts, City of Beverly, Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Lynn, Massachusetts v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45789
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lynn, Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Lynn, Massachusetts v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as MA/1:18-cv-11219
Plaintiff:
City of Lynn, Massachusetts
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation , Cardinal Health, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
City of Lynn, Massachusetts v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv11219
Plaintiff:
City of Lynn, Massachusetts
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NextG Networks of NY, Inc. v. City of Lynn, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv11020
Plaintiff:
NextG Networks of NY, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lynn, Massachusetts, Lynn City Council, John Timothy Phelan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
