Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TRSTE, LLC v. City of Melbourne, Florida
as 6:2022cv02305
Plaintiff:
TRSTE, LLC
Defendant:
City of Melbourne, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kampstra v. Pond et al
as 6:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Laura Kampstra
Defendant:
Matthew Pond, Steve Koubek, Brandon Eder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walters v. City of Melbourne, Florida
as 6:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Randall Walters
Defendant:
City of Melbourne, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Melbourne Florida v. Chemguard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv02810
Defendant:
Perimeter Solutions LP, John Doe Defendants 1-49 and Chemguard Inc
Plaintiff:
City of Melbourne Florida
Interested Party:
Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
City of Melbourne Florida v. Chemguard Inc et al
as SC/2:20-CV-02810
Plaintiff:
City of Melbourne Florida
Defendant:
Chemguard Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guarda v. The City of Melbourne, Florida et al
as 6:2017cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Guarda
Defendant:
The City of Melbourne, Florida , Steve Mimbs and Blake Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Flowers, et al v. City of Melbourne, et al
as 13-14336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT FLOWERS and LOTTIE FLOWERS
Interested Party - Appellant:
DONNA MARIE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MELBOURNE, FLORIDA, DEREK MIDDENDORF, HOWARD KNAUF and others
Francis Carter, Jr. v. City of Melbourne, Florida, et al
as 12-15337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS R. CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MELBOURNE, FLORIDA, DONALD L. CAREY and JACK M. SCHLUCKEBIER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
