Cases 11 - 20 of 115
Headsup Penny, Inc. v. City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2022cv02796
Plaintiff:
Headsup Penny, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Newburgh and Wayne Vradenburgh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. The City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2022cv02720
Plaintiff:
Donovan James
Defendant:
The City of Newburgh, P.O. Robert Breault, John and Jane 1 - 10 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh, New York et al
as 7:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Sikorsky
Defendant:
City of Newburgh, New York, City of Newburgh, NY Corporate Counsel, Jeremy Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
392 N. Montgomery LLC v. City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
392 N. Montgomery LLC
Defendant:
City of Newburgh, City of Newburgh Water Department, Wayne Vradenbrugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Lewis v. Jacobson
as 22-78
Petitioner:
Regina Lewis
Respondent:
Joesph Donat, City Manager, City of Newburgh, Ramona Monteverde, City Council and others
Lewis v. Skoufis et al
as 7:2021cv08487
Plaintiff:
Regina Lewis
Defendant:
James Skoufis, Johnathan Jacobson, City of Newburgh Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv03140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
