Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vaughan et al v. Wardhaugh et al
as 4:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Vaughan and Amy A. Vaughan
Defendant:
Russell L. Wardhaugh, Amanda N. Wardhaugh, Castlewood Brokers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Oakland, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45916
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Abbott Laboratories, purdue pharma l.p and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oakland, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
City of Oakland, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 8:2019cv02026
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oakland, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
City of Oakland, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv02026
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oakland, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Harjit Bhambra, et al v. Port of Oakland, et al
as 09-16458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARJIT BHAMBRA and LAKHBIR BHAMBRA
Defendant - Appellee:
PORT OF OAKLAND, DARLENE AYERS-JOHNSON, OMAR BENJAMIN and others
Harjit Bhambra, et al v. Port of Oakland, et al
as 09-15780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARJIT BHAMBRA and LAKHBIR BHAMBRA
Defendant - Appellee:
PORT OF OAKLAND, DARLENE AYERS-JOHNSON, OMAR BENJAMIN and others
Wagner v. City of Oakland et al
as 1:2008cv03390
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Wagner
Defendant:
City of Oakland, James L. Sherbin, Robert M. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bhambra et al v. Port of Oakland et al
as 3:2008cv05326
Plaintiff:
Harjit Bhambra and Lakhbir Bhambra
Defendant:
Port of Oakland, Darlene Ayers-Johnson, Omar Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John R. Pierson v. George W. Bush et al.,
as 3:2006cv00378
Plaintiff:
John R. Pierson
Defendant:
George W. Bush, FBI, City of Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
