Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Calhoun County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Calhoun County, Alabama, Clay County, Alabama, Talladega County, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Calhoun County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc
as 7:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Calhoun County, Alabama, Clay County, Alabama, Talladega County, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Piedmont, Alabama v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2021op45049
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Piedmont, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1301
Petitioner:
City of Piedmont, California, Howard County, Maryland, City of Gaithersburg, Maryland and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, et al
as 19-70146
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Amicus Curiae:
MISSOURI BASIN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, BERKSHIRE-LITCHFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL POWER ASSOCIATION and others
City of San Jose, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70144
Petitioner:
CITY OF ARCADIA, Calfornia, CITY OF MONTEREY, California, CITY OF PIEDMONT, California and others
Intervenor:
COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Seattle, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70136
Intervenor:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF LACEY, Washington, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada and others
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES, CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
