Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Williams v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
Shane Williams
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Laura Keck, Blessing Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Curran et al
as 3:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Shane Williams
Defendant:
Brian Curran, Heather Lindell, City of Quincy Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flaugher v. Curry et al
as 3:2023cv03208
Plaintiff:
Douglas Flaugher
Defendant:
Brian Curry, Sue Heister, . Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleary v. Gibson et al
as 1:2022cv04427
Plaintiff:
John Cleary
Defendant:
Det. Adam Gibson, Police Chief Robert Copley, Unknown Quincy Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Douglas v. Bangert et al
as 3:2021cv03081
Defendant:
Paul Hodges, Kevin Pavon, Kin Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. City of Quincy et al
as 3:2021cv03043
Defendant:
Quincy, City of, Adams County Jail, Gary Farha and others
Plaintiff:
Abriece Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Lovelace, et al v. Adam Gibson, et al
as 20-3254
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF QUINCY, ADAM GIBSON, Detective, JOHN SUMMERS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINCOLN LOVELACE, LOGAN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
Smith v. City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03289
Plaintiff:
Shannon Smith
Defendant:
The City of Quincy , Officer Travis Wiemelt , Mercantile Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. The City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03147
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Newman
Defendant:
The City of Quincy, Robert Copley, Kyle Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
