Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Williams v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Sonya Felecia Williams
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Estella Patterson, Christopher D Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McKoy v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKoy
Defendant:
City of Raleigh and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Edwards v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Leo J. Edwards
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Blackmon v. Holder et al
as 5:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
James Blackmon
Defendant:
James Holder, Andrew Munday and City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keister v. Wake County District Attorney Office et al
as 5:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Francis Keister
Defendant:
Wake County District Attorney Office, Lorrin Freeman, City of Raleigh and others
Ward v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Delbert Quillen Ward
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fullard v. City of Raleigh
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
CHANDRA FULLARD
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
City of Raleigh v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
City of Raleigh
Defendant:
3M Company, Angus Fire, AGC Chemical Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ussery v. Cooper et al
as 4:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Monica Faith Ussery
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Erik A. Hooks, Lorrin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
