Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of Red Oak, Texas v. AGRI
as 21-51123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Red Oak, Texas and Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, acting by and through George Ervin "Sonny" Perdue, III, Secretary of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, acting by and through Edd Hargett, State Director, Rockett Special Utility District and others
Rockett Special Utility District v. Alamo Mission, LLC
as 1:2021cv00678
Plaintiff:
Nic Rockett Special Utility District and Rockett Special Utility District
Respondent:
Alamo Mission, LLC, Compass Datacenters DFW III, LLC, City of Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation and others
Defendant:
City of Red Oak Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rockett Special Utility District v. City of Red Oak Texas
as 3:2020cv01320
Defendant:
City of Red Oak Texas
Plaintiff:
Rockett Special Utility District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
City of Red Oak, Texas et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2020cv00483
Defendant:
Rockett Special Utility District, Rural Utilities Service, CoBank ACB and others
Plaintiff:
City of Red Oak, Texas and Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
City of Red Oak, Texas v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2019cv02761
Plaintiff:
City of Red Oak, Texas and Red Oak Industrial Development Corporation
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Rockett Special Utility District, Rural Utilities Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Fullerton et al
as 3:2007cv00565
Plaintiff:
Tammie Hughes
Defendant:
Donald Fullerton, William Snell and City of Red Oak, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
